Wednesday, May 31, 2006

Beau Biden To Announce for Attorney General

Announcement Details:
Hallie And Beau Biden
Invite You And Your Family
To Join Them At
The Announcement of

Beau Biden
Candidate for Delaware Attorney General

Thursday, June 1, 2006


RSVP@BidenAG.com
(Include your full name and number attending (adults/children))

Please Respond With Your Acceptance or Regret — We Want To Stay in Touch.

*****

Details by County Below:

Sussex County — 8:00 am
Old Sussex County Courthouse
10 South Bedford Street
Coffee and Doughnuts

Kent County — 12:00 noon
The Schwartz Center for the Arts
226 South State Street
Brown Bag Lunch

New Castle County — 5–8:00 pm, Speech at 6 pm
Biden Headquarters
The Shipyard Shops at The Riverfront
(Near L.L. Bean)
918 South Madison Street
Light Fare
The Delaware GOP issued the following statement:
Beau Biden Marks 4 Years At Delaware Bar By Announcing For Attorney General

WILMINGTON, DE --- David A. Crossan, Sr., Executive Director of the Republican Party of Delaware, issued the following statement today on the 4 year anniversary of Joseph R. (Beau) Biden, III being admitted to the Delaware Bar.

“This week, Beau Biden will celebrate his 4th anniversary of being admitted to the Delaware Bar by officially announcing that he wants to be Delaware's Attorney General.

With only four years at the Delaware Bar, Beau Biden is not qualified under Delaware law to serve as an arbitrator in a civil case, to serve as a Family Court Judge, or to be a preceptor, or mentor, for another applicant to the Delaware Bar.

These laws are in place to ensure that a certain level of experience be required for such important positions. While Delaware law has no such requirement for the Attorney General, this raises serious concerns about whether the Department of Justice should be run by someone who is not qualified by law to perform these other important roles.

The fact that Beau Biden is unqualified to serve in roles such as these makes it even clearer that he is not ready to be Attorney General.”

(2006 Delaware Bar Directory: Beau Biden Admitted May 31, 2002)

(Superior Court Civil Rule 16.1 states that active arbitrators shall consist of all members of the Delaware Bar actively engaged in the practice of law for more than 5 years.)

(Title 10 Delaware Code Sec. 906(c) states that Judges of the Family Court must be members of the Delaware Bar for at least 5 years prior to their appointment.)

(Board of Bar Examiners Rule 10a states that an attorney is qualified to act as a preceptor if the attorney has been admitted to the Bar for at least 10 years.)

###

What's going on with the Sussex GOP?

I received an email from a Sussex County Republican today asking me to do a post about the Sussex County GOP. This individual was quite critical of the Sussex Party and upset at the seeming lack of activity coming from those in charge. I feel a bit cautious in doing this post, due to my status as a part-time Sussex Countian. But, since it came up...

The Sussex GOP's status update for 2006:

Reps. Ewing, Carey, Booth, Hocker, Lee, Atkins, Councilmen Phillips and Cole running for re-election and expected to win. Dan Short running to replace retiring Rep. Fallon, also expected to win.

Democrat incumbents:

- Pete Schwartzkopf - D - 14th Rep district - Unopposed as of yet
- George Bunting - D - 12th Senate district - Unopposed as of yet
- Thurman Adams - D - 18th Senate district - Unopposed as of yet

So, three of the four Sussex legislative seats the GOP doesn't own are up and there are no opponents for them. Schwartzkopf is rumored to be running for LG in 2008, and the scuttlebutt is that this may be Adams' last go-round. So why not run people for those seats specifically, who would then have the fast-track and the experience to run again when the seats open? Plus, a great example of recruiting paying off is Bunting. Among the last three opponents he defeated were a couple of guys named George Cole and Gerald Hocker. They lost to Bunting, but it seems like things turned out okay for them, since they now go by "Councilman" and "Representative". Also, Schwartzkopf and Bunting have been opposed in every election for their offices, and Adams has had opponents in 2 of his last 3 elections. So, folks, it's been done before.

This led my emailer to his/her next point, which is, "Are we even planning for '08 and '10? Who's going to replace Ben Ewing? George Carey? Adams? Venables? Schwartzkopf?" If the Sussex GOP is worth its salt, they know the answer to those questions already.

I'm told by another source that the Sussex party's sole focus right now is running around trying to find people to give them money so they can pay for their executive director, but what exactly does that person do? The tab for the ED is enough to fund a state Senate campaign, for crying out loud. I'm told past chairs of the county committee were successful without an ED, so why can't current chair Bill Lee do the same? Under a guy named Keller Hopkins in 2002, the county held all of their incumbents; held an open county row office; picked up an open Dem seat and came within 600 votes of another; and beat two incumbent legislators; and he did it without an ED.

Here's my recommendation to those loyal GOPers in Sussex with some disposable income. Do not give it to the Sussex GOP. There are no races in Sussex whose outcome is in question for 2006. Instead, send it to these folks (if you need addresses, email me):

-Brian Moore, candidate for State Rep., 20th district. Max donation $600.
-Mike Ramone, candidate for State Senate, 8th district. Max $600.
-Gregory Chambers, candidate for State Senate, 1st district. Max $600.
-Ferris Wharton, candidate for Attorney General. Max $1200.

And what's with the persistent rumors about Bill Lee planning an '08 Governor run when we need to be moving forward, not backward? It's enough to make your head spin. I'm told he "won't rule it out." Well, Judge Lee, if it's true, for the party's sake -- RULE IT OUT. You couldn't get your party's nomination for the open seat in 2000, and you couldn't beat the worst governor in recent history when she was vulnerable in 2004. There's a whale of a difference between Ruth Ann Minner and Carney or Markell. What in anyone's right mind makes you think you can run again and win? The same question goes to Terry Spence, John Burris, Mike Protack and anyone else who ran for Governor in 2000 or 2004.

It's time for fresh blood and new energy, all across the board.

Thoughts?


cross-posted at delathought

Monday, May 29, 2006

13th Representative District Election Preview

District Map (PDF)

Registration Breakdown (As of 5/1/2006)
    Democrat: 6,482
    Republican: 2,486
    Other: 3,280 (Source)

Candidates
Democrats:
    Edward F. Doyle, Jr.
    John L. ("Larry") Mitchell, Jr.
Republican:
    John Jaremchuk
(I wasn't able to find website links for the Democratic candidates. I'll update the post with them if someone can provide them.)

Financial Data
No finance reports are available online for the candidates.

Past Election Results
    2004: 36.6% GOP
    2002: 40.2% GOP
(Source)
(Results based on contested races that include the entire district and only includes votes for the two major parties.)

Brief Candidate Bios
Larry Mitchell is a Sergeant with the New Castle County Police Department and has been very active in the state FOP, serving as Legislative Chairman where he successfully promoted legislation to improve officers' pension plans and tuition assistance for active officers. He's been endorsed by a host of Democrats, including retiring Representative John Van Sant, Senator Patty Blevins and County Councilman Joe Reda, all of whom represent the area currently.

I can't find anything online about Edward Doyle, but he faces a tough time in the primary against the strongly supported Mitchell.

Former Elsmere Mayor, Treasurer and current Councilman John Jaremchuk is running as the Republican candidate for State Representative. He's made the most news recently for his proposed legislation that would have fined anyone in Elsmere who could not produce proof of US residency with 72 hours or who housed or employed illegal aliens.

Analysis
We can likely chalk up the Democratic primary as a win for Mitchell. His strong ties to the FOP provide him with a large core of dedicated and hardworking volunteers. (I can speak from experience on that one; the FOP provided a great deal of work for a campaign I worked on.) He'll also have the support of the Democratic party regulars which is often decisive in a primary campaign, as that will give him the advantage of the party organization, lists, money, volunteers, etc. Expected Democratic Primary Winner: Mitchell

Jaremchuk enters the race with high name identification due to his stance on illegal immigration. This is a mixed bag, though as the publicity surrounding his legislation brought a good deal of scorn down upon him and has set a lot of people against him. He also faces a district that's over one-eighth Hispanic (based of 2002 numbers, no online source) and outright majority Democrat. Given his party affiliation and stance on the issue of illegal immigration, those numbers don't bode well for his candidacy. Barring a major turn of events, this seat will likely stay Democratic. Expected General Election Winner: Mitchell

Friday, May 26, 2006

Carper & Ting on Immigration Reform Bill

Carper's Statement:
WASHINGTON (May 25, 2006) – Sen. Tom Carper, D-Del., today released the following statement on the Senate immigration reform bill, which passed the Senate on a vote of 62-36. Carper voted in favor of the legislation.

“It's estimated that there are already 12 million unauthorized aliens in the United States, and that number is growing by almost 10,000 per week. In order to secure our borders and deal with the millions of undocumented immigrants living in this country, we need to develop an immigration reform plan that is tough, smart and comprehensive, and see it signed into law this year.

The Senate bill isn't perfect, but it represents a good-faith attempt to pass a bipartisan immigration bill that will increase security at our borders without providing amnesty to the millions of illegal immigrants living in this country.

The bill would tighten border security by hiring additional border agents, deploying the latest surveillance technology and constructing strategic barriers at our most-vulnerable points. At the same time, it would allow undocumented immigrants already in the United States to eventually earn their citizenship rights if they hold down a job, learn English, pay a fine and all back taxes, and, most importantly, obey the law.

It will be tough to marry the Senate bill with immigration legislation passed by the House, but my hope is that we can work together and come up with a bipartisan solution to immigration reform this year. We shouldn’t let politics stand in the way of enacting a tough, smart and comprehensive immigration bill this year.”
Ting's statement:
WILMINGTON – Jan C. Ting, U.S. Senate Candidate, issued the following statement concerning Thursday’s vote on the Senate Immigration Bill:

"Tom Carper and other supporters of the Senate immigration bill have voted for amnesty now, even while thousands of illegal aliens continue to cross our borders into the U.S. every single night of the year.

"The border security measures in the Senate bill are insufficient, and will result in continuing illegal immigration, just like the 1986 comprehensive immigration reform and amnesty.

"The provisions of the bill, such as trying to distinguish 5-year illegal aliens from others, are simply unworkable. The border must be secured before tackling the problem of illegal aliens already here.

"That was the point of the Isakson amendment rejected by Tom Carper. The amnesty provisions will not only cover most of the estimated 12 million illegal aliens in the U.S., but their spouses and children as well, even those not yet in the U.S. So the total number amnestied could be as many as 30 million.

"This vote is simply a politically-expedient ‘Band-Aid’ to a continuing crisis."

Wedding Bells

Our own Jeff the Baptist is getting married this Sunday.

On behalf of the entire Delaware Conservative Blogger's Alliance, I'd like to wish Jeff and Amybear a lifetime of happiness.

Monday, May 22, 2006

The Delaware GOP's 2006 Comeback

After two torturous election cycles in the First State, the Delaware GOP appears to be eyeing a resurgence in Election 2006. It looks to me like the GOP's plan is to hold all of their incumbents, split the Castle-Carper races, pick up all of the open seats in the Delaware Legislature, and knock off at least one if not two incumbent state senators. Add to this a win for Tom Wagner and a re-take of the Attorney General seat by Ferris Wharton, and you will have yourself an old-fashioned, behind-the-woodshed whuppin', as they call it down here in saltwater Sussex. And all this is possible. A look at 2006:

OPEN LEGISLATIVE SEATS

13th Representative - (VanSant-D retires)
Former Elsmere Mayor John Jaremchuk v. DE FOP President Larry Mitchell
I don't know Jaremchuk, but anyone who can stomach Elsmere politics for that long has to have a decent shot at this seat, especially with immigration being a hot topic. All I can say about Mitchell is 'Do we need another cop in Dover?' Aren't Lee, Ewing, Williams, Schwartzkopf, Vaughn and company enough? Aren't the state police babied and protected enough already? Jaremchuk will need to have everything go his way to beat someone who's both a cop and a union leader in Elsmere, but he's definitely in the running.

20th Representative - (Roy-R retires)
Red Clay SD Facilities Manager Brian Moore v. businessman Richard Korn
See here.

33rd Representative - (Caulk-I retires)
Levy Court Commissioner Jack Peterman v. businessman Bobby Walls. If you take a map of Jack Peterman's Levy Court district and lay it over a map of the 33rd district, it would almost match. Peterman is a lock. It doesn't hurt that the 33rd is staunchly Republican.

39th Representative - (Fallon-R retires)
Ex-Seaford Mayor Dan Short v. Sussex Tech School Board memberRandall O'Neal. Write this one down in ink, too. Short by a lot. The popular ex-mayor almost beat Bob Venables in the 39th's portion of the '04 Senate race.

CHALLENGED SEATS

1st Senatorial
Senate Majority Leader Harris McDowell III was first elected in 1976. He was, with Roger Roy, the driving force behind the deregulation that led to the Delmarva Power rate hike. Those two facts make him as ripe for the picking as any incumbent. His opponent, Greg Chambers, has spent his entire adult life in service to others. He has worked for the State of Delaware for over 20 years, after working for the City of Wilmington for 13 years. His list of volunteer work is impressive, and he won a Governor's Award for Volunteerism in 2004. Serves others selflessly, running against a DIPer. I can't wait to hear the Nancy's and the Dana Garrett's of the world jump on Mr. Chambers' bandwagon. He has most certainly earned a shot to represent the people of the first SD. It's an uphill battle, in a district that went 68-32 for Kerry and 61-39 for Minner in 2004, but this could be the year.

8th Senatorial
I've touched on this one before, but here's a recap. John Allison/Kilroy will tell you all you need to hear about Sokola. Ramone is a small businessman with a big heart and a ton of campaign experience. He lost narrowly to Sokola in 2002, and absolutely has a great shot in this pocketbook/anti-incumbent year of knocking off the incumbent. Relatively equal district only went 53-47 for Kerry and 53-47 for Minner in 2004.

By my calculations, a Ramone win and a Chambers win would make the Senate 11D-10R. Can you say "Excuse me, Sen. Venables, the GOP is on the phone" ???

KEY STATEWIDE RACES

Auditor - (Wagner v. ?????)
Wagner keeps on rolling.

Attorney General - (Wharton v. Biden)
What can I say? Compare the resumes. Compare the experience. When it gets down to it, this will be a case of the Delaware people having a choice: the right name for Delaware politics, or the right person for the job. In a perfect world, where educated people familiarize themselves with the issues and the candidates, Wharton would be a lock. However, this is Delaware, where the citizenry gives you eight years of Ruth Ann Minner, so who knows?

There are some danger spots for GOP incumbents, such as House Speaker Terry Spence, who inexplicably is rumored to be losing labor's support this year; and Rep. Stephanie Ulbrich, who ran less than 60% against "activist" John Kowalko (and by activist I mean likes to do public things to boost his name ID in free media) in 2004 and now faces him again in the wake of the Delmarva rate hikes. If those two can hold on, and most of what I laid out above comes to pass, it will be a beautiful day for the GOP in November.

Friday, May 19, 2006

Americans for Better Immigration

For those interested, Americans for Better Immingration has published a scorecard comparing Senator Carper with his expected GOP opponents on immingration issues. (It still lists Colin Bonini as a potential opponent so some of the imformation is out of date.) Carper is given a "D" by the group for his past and recent votes on immigration issues. By way of comparison, Biden received a "D" for his career and an "F" for his recent votes, while Castle received a "B" for his career and a "C+" for his recent votes.

Link via The Corner.

Tuesday, May 16, 2006

DCBA Announcement

Now you can see all of the activity from the Delaware Conservative Blogger Alliance on one webpage. This page takes the top five posts from each member and puts it on one simple page. Ahh, the power of RSS feeds.

Enjoy!

Delaware Conservative Blogger Alliance News

Monday, May 15, 2006

The Fallacy of the Sussex NIMBY's

Since Thurman Adams introduced SB 304, a bill to add two seats to County Council following the 2010 census, and the NIMBYs responded with a 'that's not good enough' attitude, it allows me to bring up once again the fallacy of the argument of the 'Citizens for a Better Sussex.' They mention several times on their web site the term "fair representation." They have a petition, wherein they say
"For years Sussex County Council districts favored western councilmen over eastern councilmen -- permitting 2 councilmen to both come from Laurel and one from Greenwood, giving the west control -- with 3 out of 5 votes.

However, 2004 voter data reveals that at least 67% of the county actually resided East of U. S. Route 113--not West.

With numbers like that in 2004, eastern Sussex should now have 4 council representatives, but still has only 2.

Furthermore, 5th district lines capture nearly all of southeastern Sussex waterfront land in one place, giving those voters just one council vote, resulting in frequent 4 to 1 losses."
The argument is that although 67% of the citizens of the county are east of Rt. 113, 60% of the council is from Western Sussex, and that is unfair. What they don't tell you is that two of the districts are entirely or nearly entirely in Eastern Sussex, and a majority of the voters in the 5th district are in Eastern Sussex.

According to the Delaware Coast Press, in 2002, "former Fenwick Island mayor Peg Baunchalk ran for County Council against Councilman Vance Phillips, R-Laurel, whom she took to task over his pro- growth voting record. One might think Democrat Baunchalk would have found a friendly reception for his position, at least in the east. According to the 2000 census, 56 percent of the voters in Phillips' district resided east of Route 113 -- a number that has certainly increased in six years. But Phillips garnered 63 percent of the vote against Baunchalk, who beat him only in her own polling place and only by a meager eight votes."

Lynn Rogers sought his re-election in 2004 against Republican Judson Bennett, who took a rabid anti-growth stance and ran right at Rogers as being in the pockets of developers, in the Eastern Sussex growth area of Milton and Lewes. Rogers won. He won by the slimmest of margins, but he won nonetheless.

Therefore, the people of Eastern Sussex have had ample opportunity to put anti-growth councilmen into, yet they failed to do so. The silent majority thinks, basically, that although there are more people, more houses and more cars, there are also more opportunities, more restaurants and grocery options and more to do. They are basically okay with it, or else Rogers and Phillips would have lost. Had Baunchalk won the 2002 race against Phillips, the NIMBY's would not be crying foul, yet the circumstances would be the same. So, in reality, the people of Eastern Sussex have had fair representation, and they have more votes than those in the West. They exercised those votes, and chose to keep the council intact. I predict they will do the same this year.

cross-posted at delathought

Conservatives sitting out 2006 hurts the GOP’s right, not the RINOs

Jim Geraghty argues that while the frustration among conservatives who are contemplating sitting out the 2006 election in frustration over the inability of a Republican Congress to act like Republicans is understandable, it would be counterproductive to the conservative cause to do so. Going through a list of Senate and House races that are in play, he shows that, by and large, sitting out would replace a conservative with a liberal while leaving the "moderate" Republicans unscathed.
Why are so many conservatives hell-bent on cutting off their nose to spite their face? Are they really willing to throw away a decade’s worth of work and go back to square one?

We usually like looking at the Daily Kos crowd insisting for an immediate pullout of the troops or impeachment hearings right this second and we laugh at them for their ludicrously unrealistic expectations.

But apparently the Kos are not the only ones with an all-or-nothing mentality. Sometimes in life you have to use the West Coast offense, nickel and diming your way down the field instead of going for the long bomb. If I want a more conservative government, I get it by electing the more conservative of the two choices, even if he isn’t as conservative as I would like. I do not get it by sitting on the sidelines and pouting, and letting the less conservative guy take the reigns of power.
Unfortunately, he's right. By and large the RINOs come from safe districts while the conservative win the competitive districts. (Then the RINOs claim they have to be moderate to win re-election, despite having pretty much clincked by appearing with an R after their name om the ballot.)

While there are plenty of Republicans I'd like to see lose, they're not the ones who are likely to. Conservatives will have to work to reelect the good ones and hope to wait out the RINOs and replace them when possible.

In the meantime, let's not punish the good ones while allowing the ones we're justly angry with to gain in influence in our party.

Saturday, May 13, 2006

United 93 Reactions

I just got back from seeing United 93 with a contingent of the Delaware Conservative Blogger Alliance (DCBA). In attendance were Hube (and spouse), Paul Smith, Jr., Mark Levin Fan (and spouse), Miss AO, and Anna Venger.

I will post links to their reactions of the movie once they go up.

My reaction at Jokers to the Right

Miss AO has her reaction up


Hube's thoughts


Anna Venger's reaction


Paul Smith, Jr.'s review

Thursday, May 11, 2006

Brian Moore, Richard Korn and the 20th RD Race

(FOREWORD: I once said that I would never question Richard Korn's motivations. That, however, was before the anti-everything establishment began to fit him for a crown as hero of the people. I waited for it to stop, hoped that reality would set in, but it looks like I waited and hoped in vain. So, I dug a little deeper into Korn's lawsuits, his publicity stunts and his prior political career in New York. This is the result.)


Richard Korn, who will announce his candidacy for State Representative in the 20th district on Friday, admirably moved to Delaware a few years ago to be closer to his ailing mother, but it didn't take long for him to begin following some familiar pursuits: suing governments, seeking publicity and trying to get elected. For someone who once claimed, "I didn't come here to run for office," it didn't take him long to change his mind, and now he's doing it again, two years later.

Interestingly enough, the lawsuit he filed against New Castle County was nearly a mirror image to a similar suit he filed in 1988 against Nassau County, New York Administrator Tom Gulotta. The charge: That the county illegally built up a surplus to be used in later years; a reserve orrainy day fund, if you will. Now, I'm certainly not one who likes to see people overtaxed, but as you can see today, the county needed that money, so the practice of creating a reserve fund was sound fiscal management.

Korn's suit cost the county time and money to defend. The outcome: Korn won, then County Council automatically adjusted their policies to fit the money into their rules. Korn had to know this would happen, and that the net result of his suit would be nothing at all, but it was the best way to get his name out there for his obvious next move: running for New Castle County Executive. Again, eerily reminiscent of his Nassau County days, where he successfully sued the county government, got a load of publicity, and then ran for the executive position. He clearly had a plan.

His race for County Executive here in Delaware never really got off the ground, and he was trounced in the primary. Perhaps he didn't have enough base support here, as evidenced by his using a Philadelphia lawyer named Stan Ellenberg as his campaign chair and his limited in-state financial support.

Korn's next "coup" was helping to bring the CITGO home heating oil program to Delaware through his wife's personal connections to the Venezuelans. It's something he should be applauded for, and he has clearly given people the opportunity to applaud. He staged a big press conference with the Venezuelan Ambassador, and again, somehow, he appeared in the paper. One question, though: If he's so close to the Venezuelans, and as some claim, the whole CITGO program was Korn's idea, why did Delaware only get 1.15 million gallons of discounted oil, when Rhode Island got 3.3 million gallons, despite having a similar per capita income and weather conditions not tremendously unlike our own? (I know. I've lived in both places.) You would think we could get at least as good a deal as Rhode Island.

Feeling, I suppose, that his name had been out of the papers for too long, Korn next decided to file a complaint with the Department of Justice's Antitrust Division about Delmarva Power's 50%-plus increase, asking for an investigation, stating that:

"Today, seven years after deregulation and choice was mandated by statute, a deregulated monopoly still exists. "DP&L" Delmarva Power & Light Company and "DEC" Delaware Electric Cooperative remain the only two residential electric distribution/suppliers in the state of Delaware."

He claimed the fact that there are only two suppliers in Delaware as evidence substantiating his charge. However, anyone who has given any thought to the situation quickly realizes that the price freezes of the last seven years are the reason there's been no competition. Now that the caps have been lifted, at least one other provider, Washington Gas and Electric, has already entered the market. So, the complaint is now moot, yet Korn's name, picture and transparent populist pandering made the paper yet again.

So, are we to assume Richard Korn had no plans to run for the 20th RD seat when he trotted out the Venezuelan Ambassador to a press conference or fired off a pointless letter to the Justice Department? Or is he the same type of opportunist politician we have come to know and love, one who claims allegiance to the people when we know that just under the surface is an ego-filled starvation for power and attention?

It's abundantly clear, for those who are open to seeing it, that Richard Korn simply wants an elected office with which to satisfy his decades-long thirst for electoral success, and a pulpit for publicity. Korn could have easily helped in the CITGO situation and sent the letter to the Justice Department without the press releases and press events, but that would not have raised his name ID to a sufficient level to run for office again. At this point, does anyone still believe that Richard Korn is the voice for the people?

Okay, arguments aside; let's look at the hard numbers. In 2004, both Korn and his opponent, Brian Moore, ran unsuccessfully for countywide seats; Korn, for County Executive, and Moore, for Clerk of the Peace. Breaking down the individual races into their vote totals specifically for the 20th district, you find that:

- Moore got 47% of the General Election vote, nearly 5,000 votes, against Ken Boulden, who had been Clerk of the Peace for 8 years, was popular, and had performed his job competently.

- Korn got 164 votes, or 18% of the vote, in the Democratic Primary, losing by almost a 4-to-1 margin to Chris Coons, and only outpolling controversial County CAO Sherry Freebery by 47 votes.

These numbers draw two conclusions. First, the people of the 20th RD clearly want to give Brian Moore a chance to represent them, even against an incumbent they approve of. Second, Richard Korn appears to have had little or no voting support in the 20th district, even among Democrats.

Certain people, especially the "anti-everything" types, will put a lot of emphasis on this race, due to Korn's populist leanings and media-grabbing antics, as the “us against the establishment” race. Some will treat it as if Korn is running against the entire legislature, when in truth he is running against Brian Moore to represent the people of the 20th district.

Brian Moore has earned it the right way, through many years of service to his community. A native of New Castle County, Brian has served others both professionally and civically his entire adult life. A former member of the Coast Guard Reserves, Moore is currently a Facilities Manager for the Red Clay Consolidated School District. He is the president of the Pike Creek Civic Association, the Limestone Hills Maintenance Corp. and is involved with the Delaware Police Athletic League as a member of its Board of Directors. He is also an 18-year veteran volunteer fireman and a Fire School Instructor.

Add all of this up and you see Brian Moore is truly involved on a day-to-day basis with the people of the 20th district, and he knows this Republican district and its people well from the ground up. This choice in this case is abundantly clear, and Moore should retain the seat. For Moore, by his actions over the long term, has proven himself to be the true ‘peoples champion’ in this race.

It is important to support Brian Moore with both your money, and if possible, your time. The address to send contributions is: Brian Moore for State Representative, 15 Bellmont Drive, Wilmington, DE 19808. Send $6 or send $600, whatever you can, and tack an extra $.o6 onto the end to let him know that the online community is behind him.

We don't need another self-serving, ego-driven politician in Dover looking to climb the political ladder. We need Brian Moore.


cross-posted at delathought

Wharton Launches Campaign Site

FerrisWharton.com is online. Visit the site to learn about the candidate and his impressive record.

“The outpouring of support I’ve received over the past several weeks has been humbling,” Mr. Wharton said. “It’s good to now have FerrisWharton.com available for people to access the latest information, sign up for email updates, make donations, and get involved.”

“As I travel across Delaware, people are asking what they can do to help with this campaign,” Mr. Wharton said. “It’s exciting to now be able to offer the web site as a central place to learn more and find the specific areas where they can best offer their time and talent to make a difference.”

Wednesday, May 03, 2006

The Nerd and the Head Cheerleader

Talking to a friend who's a GOP party dropout like myself this weekend, we discussed the Mike Protack situation. I made the analogy that Mike Protack is the guy in high school who can't accept the girl just isn't interested. No matter how many times and how many different ways he asks, the girl just won't go out with him. Rather than setting his sights on another girl, he keeps going after this one girl to exclusion of a girl who might actually be interested in him.

Mike Protack is not pursuing just any girl but the head cheerleader, the top spot on the Delaware GOP ticket. In each of the past three elections, he's sought the top spot available for a Delaware Republican, only to be rejected by the GOP Convention, where delegates are elected by the grassroots membership of the party. (I don't have results for past years, but he got beat over 5-1 this year and past margins were similar, I believe.)

In 2002, after running for US Senate against Ray Clatworthy and losing at the convention, Protack gave a gracious speech where he pledged to respect the convention's decisions and work to elect Clatworthy. I, and many others I talked to, were impressed with his graciousness and were ready to support him for a lower office in a future campaign. (It's no insult to say that someone isn't ready for a state-wide campaign, just as it's no insult to say that a player right out of the draft isn't ready for the major leagues. That's why we have minor leagues, to prepare people for the majors. Similarly, many people need to build a resume before they can be a credible state-wide candidate.)

But Protack can't get that head cheerleader out of his head, so rather than going for the pretty flutist in the band. Not content to run for a state representative seat or some other local position, Protack will accept nothing other than the top spot on the ticket. (Think of it this way: he demands to be on the ticket ahead of a two-time Governor and seven-time Congressman.)

To make matters worse, after his two most recent defeats he's angrily attacked the cheerleading squad and tried to force his way into the head cheerleader's arms. He's tried telling her how popular he is with people outside the cheerleading squad, using misleading polls as his evidence. (Here's an example. If you read it closely, it's clear what Protack has done here is a complete misuse of polling. It's legitimate to ask questions like this to determine your strengths and your opponent's weaknesses for honing a campaign's message and strategy, but is useless for determining actual campaign standing which is how he attempts to use it in his release linked to above.)

So what happened when Protack took his case to the rest of the student body for their support in his quest to date the head cheerleader? Over 70% of them voted for the starting quarterback Bill Lee, with only 23.5% supporting Protack.

So, the cheerleader's not interested, and the cheerleading squad and student body think she can do better? It's time for our nerd to move on from the head cheerleader and hope the flutist hasn't been turned off by his obnoxious behavior.